AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

TL;DR

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get home appliances delivered free with Prime

  • Fast, free delivery on millions of items
  • Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
  • Member-only deals all year
Start your free Prime trial Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Ideal Home’s Renovation Editor tested the Morphy Richards HeatFlux 2.5kW digital oil-filled radiator at home for two weeks. The review describes its design and controls as more contemporary and user-friendly than some oil-filled models, and reports temperature rises during tests in two rooms; the listed RRP is £99.99.

Ideal Home has published a two-week test of the Morphy Richards HeatFlux 2.5kW digital oil-filled radiator, reporting that the model looks more contemporary than some traditional oil-filled heaters and can raise temperatures in medium-sized rooms. The heater has a £99.99 recommended retail price, according to the review, which tested it in a living room and kitchen diner.

Ideal Home’s Renovation Editor tested the radiator in a 1970s three-bedroom home, using it in rooms measuring about 18 square metres and 22 square metres. The product is rated at 2,500 watts and is marketed for rooms up to 25 square metres. The review lists its weight as 9.9 kilograms and its dimensions as 46.4 by 63 by 24.5 centimetres.

In the living room, the reviewer used the heater on its high setting and said a room thermostat recorded a rise of almost 1°C after 10 minutes, about 3.5°C after an hour and 5.2°C after two hours. In the larger kitchen diner, the reported rise was 2°C over two hours; the reviewer said the room felt less cold after around 30 minutes. These are results from the reviewer’s home tests, not a guarantee of performance in other rooms.

The HeatFlux offers low, medium and high heat settings, an eco mode and a thermostat adjustable from 5°C to 30°C. It also has a digital display, touch controls, a remote and an on/off timer that can be set from one to 24 hours. The review says setup took less than five minutes, though fitting the wheels required turning the 9.9kg unit over. A CR2025 battery for the remote was not included.

At a glance
reportWhen: Published in Ideal Home’s radiator revi…
The developmentIdeal Home published a two-week home test of Morphy Richards’ HeatFlux 2.5kW digital oil-filled radiator, assessing its design, controls and heating performance.

What the Home Test Found

Portable electric heaters can give households a way to warm the room they are using without turning up central heating throughout the home. The review’s measurements give readers a specific example of how the HeatFlux performed in two rooms, while its thermostat and timer offer controls for setting heat and operating time.

Those features do not establish that this model will reduce a household’s bills. Ideal Home lists estimated running costs of 26–66 pence per hour, but the source does not explain the assumptions behind that range, and actual costs depend on electricity prices, usage and settings. The reported test also does not compare the radiator’s energy use with central heating or other heaters.

The review’s focus on appearance may also matter to shoppers who want a portable heater visible in a living space. Its grey and white colour options and digital display distinguish it visually from more traditional radiator designs, but appearance is separate from heating efficiency or cost.

Amazon

digital oil-filled radiator 2.5kW

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Design, Controls and Price

The HeatFlux is an oil-filled electric radiator, rather than a smart or connected heater. Ideal Home lists no smart features or dual functionality. Its main controls are the digital touch panel and the included remote, which the reviewer said offered the same functions. The eco mode adjusts power according to the selected target temperature and the room’s ambient temperature, according to the review.

The review places the product in the seasonal market for portable heating, noting that room-by-room heating may be useful when households do not want to heat the whole home. That is the publication’s rationale for testing the unit, not a finding that using it will necessarily save money. Its £99.99 RRP is the stated recommended retail price; the source does not provide a current retailer price or report a discount.

The reviewer also described the setup materials as mostly cardboard, with some plastic and polystyrene, and found the wheel assembly easier than on other oil-filled radiators she had tested. The assessment is based on one tester’s experience over two weeks in one home, rather than a controlled comparison across multiple households.

Amazon

modern oil-filled heater with remote control

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Limits of the Two-Week Test

The published test does not establish how the heater performs across different home layouts, insulation levels, outdoor temperatures or electricity tariffs. Its temperature readings are specific to the reviewer’s living room and kitchen diner; the article does not describe a controlled comparison with another heater or provide measured electricity consumption for each test.

The review lists running costs of 26–66 pence per hour, but the supplied source does not state the electricity rate, heat setting or calculation method used for that estimate. It is also unclear whether the product’s £99.99 RRP matches current retail pricing. The supplied source material ends before the review’s full verdict, so it does not provide enough information to report a final recommendation or all potential drawbacks.

Amazon

portable electric radiator for medium rooms

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Check Price and Running Costs

The review presents a home-test assessment rather than a product launch or announcement of a new feature. Readers considering the HeatFlux can check current retailer listings against the stated £99.99 RRP, and consult the manufacturer’s instructions for operation and safety guidance. They should treat the review’s room-temperature results as one household’s experience, not a promised outcome.

For a fuller assessment of value, the missing comparison points would include independently measured electricity use, performance against other heaters, and the assumptions behind the stated hourly running-cost range. The supplied source does not say whether Ideal Home plans further testing or whether Morphy Richards has announced any related update.

Amazon

thermostatic oil-filled radiator with timer

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Key Questions

What is the Morphy Richards HeatFlux radiator?

It is a 2,500W oil-filled electric radiator with low, medium and high settings, an eco mode, an adjustable thermostat, a digital display, remote control and timer. Ideal Home lists it as suitable for rooms up to 25 square metres.

How did it perform in Ideal Home’s test?

The reviewer reported a temperature rise of about 3.5°C after one hour and 5.2°C after two hours in an approximately 18-square-metre living room. In a roughly 22-square-metre kitchen diner, the reported rise was 2°C over two hours. These measurements reflect one home test.

How much does the HeatFlux cost?

The review gives a £99.99 recommended retail price. It does not confirm current retailer prices. Ideal Home also lists estimated running costs of 26–66 pence per hour, without stating the calculation assumptions in the supplied material.

Does it have smart features?

No smart features are listed in the review. It has a remote control and a timer that can switch the heater on or off after one to 24 hours.

What is not known from the test?

The source does not provide a controlled comparison with other heaters, measured electricity use during testing or the assumptions behind the running-cost estimate. The results also do not show how the radiator will perform in homes with different room sizes, insulation or electricity rates.

Source: rss

COLD & FLU SEASO

Cold & flu season Picks

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

You May Also Like

COSORI 9-in-1 vs COSORI Lite: Comprehensive Comparison

Compare the COSORI 9-in-1 TurboBlaze Air Fryer with the COSORI Lite, focusing on features, performance, and which model suits your cooking needs best.

Best Roborock Robot Vacuum for Hardwood Floors (2026) — Guide 14

Discover the top Roborock models of 2026, from all-around performers to budget picks. Find your perfect robot vacuum and mop today.

Best Dyson Cordless Vacuum for Allergies (2026) — Guide 8

Discover the top Dyson products of 2026, from versatile hair stylers to powerful cordless vacuums. Find your perfect match today!

Best Bissell Carpet Cleaners for Area Rugs (2026) — Top Picks

Discover the top Bissell carpet cleaners for area rugs in 2026. Find the best for deep cleaning, portability, pet messes, and budget-friendly options.